Hospitals to be Penalized for Poor Performance/Re-admissions

Posted by


As a hospital administrator, you should now be aware of two major programs in the new healthcare law scheduled to kick in this month (October 2012). Its goal is to ensure better medical care and to provide added insurance by using Medicare's considerable financial influence in a “carrot and stick” approach.

 

The carrot will reward hospitals for more efficient and higher quality care; the stick will financially punish those who fail to measure up.

 

As reported in a recent issue of Politico, the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program will pay hospitals based on a performance yardstick of standard clinical quality measures as well as patient surveys of patients. The program will withhold 1 percent of Medicare payments to about 3,000 acute-care hospitals over the next year—roughly $850 million. The money will then be redistributed to the best-performing hospitals. The amount withheld jumps to 2 percent by 2016.

 

The other major program scheduled to take effect this month targets hospital re-admissions. Here, again up to 1 percent of Medicare payments will be withheld to hospitals with high re-admission rates. The goal of both programs is to replace quantity of care with quality.

 

“I think we all see these programs as the first steps towards the way the system will be structured in the future and the way incentives will be structured in the future,” said Mindy Steinberg, director of government relations for the Association of Academic Health Centers. “But everyone needs to recognize that this is the first step in a long, complicated process.”

 

Some question if the “carrots and sticks” are big enough to nudge underperforming hospitals to change. There are obviously mitigating circumstances, such as socioeconomic factors and re-admissions of certain cases that raise red flags. Here, the re-admissions program may unfairly penalize hospitals who need the funds to maintain quality healthcare.

 

The Miami Herald recently reported that 10 Tarrant County hospitals in Forth Worth—including the Medical Center of Arlington and the Texas Health Harris Methodist Fort Worth—were penalized by Medicare for re-admitting patients too soon after being discharged.

 

Medicare reimbursements for as many as 2,200 hospitals nationwide are being cut by up to 1 percent for excessive re-admissions. While it may seem like a slap on the wrist—a $30,000 claim will be reduced to $29,700 for errant hospitals—the goal is to spur hospitals to gradually improve. The re-admission problem is significant. Nearly 1 in 5 patients returns to the hospital within a month of being discharged. This costs Medicare a whopping $17.5 billion in additional hospital bills.

 

Re-admissions most often occur after heart failure, heart attack and pneumonia. While these constitute a small part of Medicare’s annual discharges, they make up a sizable number of re-admissions.

 

The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services has already begun withholding reimbursements. The penalty rises to 2 percent in October 2013 and 3 percent in October 2014. Are you ready?

 

Image courtesy of MorgueFile

Comment

Become a member to take advantage of more features, like commenting and voting.

  • Kenneth M
    Kenneth M
    I know it may sound like it's going to be effective for these programs to lower re-admission rates.  My problem as one on Medicare, who do you think is really paying for the program.  It's going to be Medicare patients in the form of higher payments.
  • Maria O
    Maria O
    GREAT Idea
  • Jose G
    Jose G
    I had some experiences by health physicians charging Medicare for services not connected to the case where a member was admitted. Firstly, I went to the Harrison Hospital in Bremerton Washington to my complaint for acid reflux, the assigned doctors evaluated my case, I was given a dose of something that made me dizzy, changed my brief to diapers, told me that I have a room ready and that I will be operated on my gall bladder. I told this doctor that I have to consult my personal doctor, which they tried to call but my doctor was with his family in Riverside California, Without any basis and relevant to my acid reflux, they want to operate immediately. Sad to note, this hospital doctor told me that I will die, I declined this operation on the grounds that it simply didn't connect to my complaint. I went home and took a dose of Ranitidine and the next day, my acid reflux was gone and I could even run on my daily jogging exercises. It is now more than 3 years that my acid reflux did not bother me at all.The hospital charged me thru my Medicare of more than $4,000 plus xrays. I was about to report this to Medicare but I did not for the charges they made.Then another thing happened when I again went to the Emergency at the Ketchikan AlaskaHealth care Hospital. My  complaint was my short of breathing. The attending doctor at the emergency is Dr. W, who gave me nebulizers and took chest xrays, as well as a recommendation that I follow the Advair and Albuterol sniffers. I was told to see a physician, Dr. P, who wanted, again, a lab test to be done to me and colonoscopy. I reasoned out with this doctor that my main Medicare sickness ever since was for disc protrussion and herniation and recently exacerbation of COPD. But Dr. P wants me to do his orders that I again declined as it is not relevant to my complaint. At present, he stopped my daily maintenance refills for Amlodipine. I don't know if whether the charges this hospital submitted to Medicare.Before this incident with Dr. P, I have a personal doctor named Dr. Madeline B, but she moved out of this hospital and became a hospitalist at a Seattle hospital. This Dr. B stopped my Atenolol prescribed by my previous doctor in Port Orchard State of Washington and told me to take Amlodipine instead of 5 10 mgs. I told her that my dosage was just 5mgs. but she insisted of the 10mgs that during the first week, my feet bulged like I was attacked with Beri beri, it hurt when I put my shoes on. Then she said to lower the mgs to 5 and having to note that there were 60 tabs still to go, she told me to throw it. I have paid a co-payment for this, but again, I wrote a letter to the Medical Assn of Alaska and complained re this matter.My problem now is Dr. P will not refill whatever medicine he did not prescribed in the first place until I agree to the lab test and colonoscopy which I declined as my right as a patient. Until now, I have no doctor here in Ketchikan. I am just taking Bayers Aspirin 81 mgs perhaps in lieu of Amlodipine. What can your office suggest to my written statement herein submitted to your office. Please guide me on what to do. Please help me.
  • Carol K
    Carol K
    I have just finished the RHIT program here in Iowa and am glad for the new programs that you are starting in October of 2012. Hopefully this program will urge hospitals to do more than their best when it comes to patient care.
  • Glaphyra j
    Glaphyra j
    Let's observe to see the ramifications.
  • Camille S
    Camille S
    In such a short synopsis not all details can be presented, but a glaring question I have and have had since first hearing about this change during my MSN days is: what accounting is made for pt non compliance? Particularly seeing CHF, MI and a lesser degree PNA, have very significant patient compliance requirements. CHF and dietary compliance and med compliance, MI with lifestyle modification - diet, exercise, smoking cessation.  If a pt bounces back with CHF and says I didn't change my diet, should the hospital bear the burden or perhaps the pt should have to pay it AND they may think twice about not modifying their diet appropriately. I've seen it all to often in my position.
  • Kelly S
    Kelly S
    I thought that this article was very informative and clearly stated the process of the current and future "carrots and sticks" program. I think it's a very good thing that will be implemented and hospitals should be encouraged to provide better care for patients in order to keep medical costs down.
  • Dale Angela B
    Dale Angela B
    After a patient leaves a hospital..there are numerous variables that a hospital has no control of.  Does the patient take the advised medication, follow a proper diet, keep appointments with their PCM? If a patient is readmitted before 30 days how can one be sure it was not due to the patient following instructions instead of proper care or discharge instructions from the hospital.
  • Lisa S
    Lisa S
    This will only lead hospitals to do whatever will make them the most money and minimize penalties.
  •  Karen C
    Karen C
    I understand that we need to estalish a system to offer the best services to the patients, however like every system there are always grey areas.  As an RN for over 35 years; one has to identify the culture and age populations in different areas to ascertain the best approach to teach people to help them maintain their own health.  Many people receive the utmost care and eduation upon discharge; however do not follow this because it is easy to return to the hospital or physician's office and usually get readmitted. I would lke to hope there is another method to educate the hospitals so they can participate more positively without fear of punishment.
  • Darryl M
    Darryl M
    Is anyone aware that not so many years ago medicare payments to private doctors were slashed so deeply that many of them were driven out of business?  I know because I used to work for one and lost my job because of the government cuts in the late 90's.  As with any government attempted take-over of a private industry, they make a general problem way to simplistic because that's the only way they can control.  Laws like this don't lend themselves to details, to individual scrutinization.  Are you aware how many drug seekers inundate any given ER on any given day?  Are you aware how many times these people are dismissed from the hospital only to return the next day?  Are you aware that originally,hospitals used to keep patients a lot longer in recovery but it was the GOVERNMENT who accused them of keeping them too long and penalized them if they did?  This is not about concern for patients but only politically motivated.  Far from helping patient care, this will continue to degrade it, insult the integrity of medical professionals, and lower patient satisfaction.
  • Jan R
    Jan R
    Once again, Obamacare at its finest! NOT! Penalize hospitals? Reward hospitals? We will see more patients dying as a result of this "wonderful"(sarcasm) government run healthcare.This is just the tip of the iceberg. If Obama is re-elected, things will only get worse for all of us except of course Congress who is not bound by Obamacare!
  • Joan R
    Joan R
    Is part of the problem the way Medicare is structured??Are patients given enough time in-house before being sent home?  Are they being re-admited with new diagnoses?  What other factors apply?

Jobs to Watch